Battle Report #2 is finally out! It's a game between Matt Cooper (Zerg) and David Kim (Terran) played on Blistering Sands. Go watch it! Then leave a comment with your thoughts.
Aw, the early size report was wrong, it's about the same size as BR1, so it's probably not 1920x1200.
PKZeppelin wrote:Sigh, video buffering is really slow, will wait until it will get more stable
You can download the lower quality version (this is the one that plays on the page as a flash video) directly here: http://us.media.blizzard.com/starcraft2 ... ort_02.flv Edit: At around 6:27 we see that the Banelings now walk instead of roll. I don't believe this was known before...interesting. They look a bit too slow and bloated in their walk to me, but with their increased size (size increased a long time ago, probably started walking shortly after) I think I prefer it to a humongous rolling thing. Full size video is now 7% downloaded (52.5/678 MB). Edit2: Around 10:27 Dustin says "terrible, terrible damage"
Interesting game, I've got to say I really like the Hydralisk model it looks really badass! About the Hunter Seeking missile- it did less damage than I actually expected it to do(luckily), but it seems like a fun ability.
Oh, and infantry units have different sizes? Apparently a bunker can only hold two Marauders?
Tiger0211 wrote:At around 6:27 we see that the Banelings now walk instead of roll. I don't believe this was known before...interesting. They look a bit too slow and bloated in their walk to me, but with their increased size (size increased a long time ago, probably started walking shortly after) I think I prefer it to a humongous rolling thing.
Isn't that before the speed upgrade? Or do they actually only walk now? Now I've got to watch it again!
Undifty wrote:Oh, and infantry units have different sizes? Apparently a bunker can only hold two Marauders?
Yeah, apparently. I think the bunker only takes four slots, and Marauders are two transport slots while the infantry are 1. Seems pretty likely, but theoretically it could be a different case for a general transport like a Medivac.
Undifty wrote:
Tiger0211 wrote:At around 6:27 we see that the Banelings now walk instead of roll. I don't believe this was known before...interesting. They look a bit too slow and bloated in their walk to me, but with their increased size (size increased a long time ago, probably started walking shortly after) I think I prefer it to a humongous rolling thing.
Isn't that before the speed upgrade? Or do they actually only walk now? Now I've got to watch it again!
I don't know if the Banelings ever actually had their speed upgraded in this game. Not sure. Also, we finally got a visual confirming that it's MULE, not Mule, so unfortunately part of one of our questions as part of the fansite Q&A is now already known.
The Spine Crawler moves way faster than I expected. I thought it'd be sort of a slow creeping, not a run! Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Tiger0211 wrote:The Spine Crawler moves way faster than I expected. I thought it'd be sort of a slow creeping, not a run! Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Did you notice the super-slow burrow time on the Spine Crawler, though?
Tiger0211 wrote:Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Edit: Yeah, its the old one like mentioned below.. Atleast it shows the infestor used in a unburrowed state. Check out 15:15 - 15:23, moving across the bottom of the screen.
Tiger0211 wrote:Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Check out 15:15 - 15:23, moving across the bottom of the screen.
Tiger0211 wrote:Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Check out 15:15 - 15:23, moving across the bottom of the screen.
GAH! It's the old Infestor. Good find, though.
True, I guess I should have mentioned it in my first reply that its not the new one.. my bad. Atleast it answers one of Tiger0211's question: It shows the infestor used unburrowed
Tiger0211 wrote:Is the new Infestor ever seen unburrowed? Around 15:54 (and again sometime later) it's visible burrowed. (I don't have the full quality one yet though, so I can't really see what it looks like) Seems like it'll be spending a lot of its in-game time underground...
Check out 15:15 - 15:23, moving across the bottom of the screen.
GAH! It's the old Infestor. Good find, though.
Huh, that's weird...I wonder if they only have the art but haven't made the new in-game model based on it yet. BTW my download stopped at 96% and is only uploading now. I have P2P communications disabled ATM and it won't download it from Blizz's direct connection either.
Awesome video. The new artwork looks even better. everytime I think Blizzard couldn't get better they get better!!!
The nighthawk was amazing, I hope it stays that way. I can see the HS missil being to powerful though, but it can be stopped. Overall it was a awesome game. The zerg units could use some more work, but I felt they were much better balanced then before.
The baneling walks? interesting, but it looked great though. New infester work was good, hydras need to be more effective vs marine, but I'm not complaining.
David Kim made a lot of mistakes, but was still able to pull it off.
Marauder had new attack grpahics, death graphics great.
Overall I give it a 9.325 out of 10. This game is really shaping up to look good. Now all we need to do is fix the upgrade system!
I was really worried about early game map domination by Zerg early on... till they focused back on the Terran again(the observer followed Zerg too much imho) And their defensive strengths stood out again.
If the Zerg had gone mutas, it could have been a much different game, but then of course David Kim seems to be their best game tester there
Khalleb wrote:Its should be interesting to see early game of zerg against protoss
If you've seen the Yellow vs. Sonkie game, it doesn't look like it will be particularly glorious for Zerg. But who knows with the number of changes that have gone into the game since then.
I wish the commentators had talked about the MULE drop @ 19:42. Notice the huge number of SCVs and the single MULE forced to distance-mine. He doesn't stop them, either, if you watch the minimap.
Khalleb wrote:Its should be interesting to see early game of zerg against protoss
If you've seen the Yellow vs. Sonkie game, it doesn't look like it will be particularly glorious for Zerg. But who knows with the number of changes that have gone into the game since then.
I wish the commentators had talked about the MULE drop @ 19:42. Notice the huge number of SCVs and the single MULE forced to distance-mine. He doesn't stop them, either, if you watch the minimap.
yea build this is an old build i want to see that on the new build
Ugh. Really don't like the Hunter-Seeker as it stands. Any canny Terran player can now utterly and completely destroy Zerg players of just about any skill level. It needs to be dialed back for sheer balancing purposes.
AUDIE wrote:My only question is was that fat thing the infester and did it kill the nighthawk?
I don't recall an Infestor killing a nighthawk, and it seems pretty unlikely considering its lack of attack and its abilities, but the Infestor still has its old purple pear with mouths model, so you'd probably recognize it. I do recall a Queen killing a Nighthawk at one point...or was it a Banshee? I don't remember. Either way, the Queen seems to be quite good at killing air.
AUDIE wrote:My only question is was that fat thing the infester and did it kill the nighthawk?
I don't recall an Infestor killing a nighthawk, and it seems pretty unlikely considering its lack of attack and its abilities, but the Infestor still has its old purple pear with mouths model, so you'd probably recognize it. I do recall a Queen killing a Nighthawk at one point...or was it a Banshee? I don't remember. Either way, the Queen seems to be quite good at killing air.
Yes the Queen does seem like a good air killer. Those hunter-seeker missiles though did a great job saving the terran from destruction. I was suprised how weak hydralusk seem vs marines and I was also surprised how long marines lasted without medivac.
Matt Cooper is a noob First he gets stuck with Banelings during early game in Terran base and doesn't go around to attack SCVs, but chooses that Terran units(Reapers?) instead. What a fail, it's early game man, attack workers to hold economy damn it. Then, after when he did that "terrible terrible damage" he attacked empty bunker, instead going for SCVs again. He should read some theory before playing first so he would know that Banelings vs. buildings is no-no. And lastly, he burrows Banelings and doesn't attack Terran group passing by, but when Terran group goes for Watchtower he all of the suddens decides to attack with these Banelings+lings, making them not as effective as could be if he attacked before. Overall Matt is dumbass, and brings shame to the Zerg. The dumbest moment when he kept burrowed units despite Terran saw and attacked them. Agreed with elfootman, noob game They should ask progamers to make a decent battlereport.
P.S. That Terran SCVs drop on new expansion was pretty awesome.
Also it looks a bit "acted" to show different units and abilities, rather than win. Terran without Siege Tank in TvZ? No Lurkers? C'mon, so many gas wasted on these Banelings...
Khalleb wrote:and u will be able to find some femel hero in the campaigne
I wonder if Nova will be making an appearance. The stories of SC:G and SC2 are supposed to happen about the same time in the lore. Besides that, and Kerrigan since I'm assuming we're talking about Terran units here, have you heard somewhere that there will be some female heroine(s) (not to be confused with heroin ) in SC2 or are you just guessing? p.s. my mineral count is now palindromic, i.e. it's 13331 and if you reverse that it's still 13331
Khalleb wrote:and u will be able to find some femel hero in the campaigne
I wonder if Nova will be making an appearance. The stories of SC:G and SC2 are supposed to happen about the same time in the lore. Besides that, and Kerrigan since I'm assuming we're talking about Terran units here, have you heard somewhere that there will be some female heroine(s) (not to be confused with heroin ) in SC2 or are you just guessing? p.s. my mineral count is now palindromic, i.e. it's 13331 and if you reverse that it's still 13331
Euhm, this is the best SC2 has ever looked, it's a recent build with most of the new shaders, did you see the dust breeze thingy in the middle?
Also, these games are just for fun to showcase the game, not give the best of esports.. and hindsight is 20/20
Couldn't agree more, I really enjoyed the graphics. And the animations are just great- but a big minus in the Battle Report was the pathing-bug for the Drone as it was chasing the SCV around the Bunker at the start of the video. (It got stuck and stopped moving for maybe a second or so.)
About the heroines, I really hope we get to see some!
lewler wrote:I hate those messages in the middle of the screen. i want them in the left... =.=
this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle
Loved the way the new (starting) Zergling model looked. It's actually starting to look like a proper "light assault warrior", instead of a typical, gnarl-toothed blur. It's got visible definition, is what I'm tryin' ta say. Also really like the map design, and the overall art texture.
lewler wrote:I hate those messages in the middle of the screen. i want them in the left... =.=
this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle
lewler wrote:I hate those messages in the middle of the screen. i want them in the left... =.=
this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle
BringCrunchaz wrote:Loved the way the new (starting) Zergling model looked. It's actually starting to look like a proper "light assault warrior", instead of a typical, gnarl-toothed blur. It's got visible definition, is what I'm tryin' ta say. Also really like the map design, and the overall art texture.
I'm actually kind of bothered by the way they look, and I'm really bothered by the way they move. When they get their wings they look better. And hydralisks' tails whip way too fast when they move.
this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle[/quote] /squelch annoyingjerk[/quote]
AUDIE wrote:this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle /squelch annoyingjerk(/quote)
Why they don't give us 2 more videos for one battle report, each video from one player perspective. it would tell us more details. Are they going to show us a battle report with 4 players. it would be more fun.
dante wrote:Why they don't give us 2 more videos for one battle report, each video from one player perspective. it would tell us more details. Are they going to show us a battle report with 4 players. it would be more fun.
I dont know if a 2v2 is a good idea. But a 2v2 can show us some new ability who can use on an other race
dante wrote:Why they don't give us 2 more videos for one battle report, each video from one player perspective. it would tell us more details. Are they going to show us a battle report with 4 players. it would be more fun.
im not so sure for the 2v2. I don't even find any game in 2v2 as much entertening as an 1v1 matchu up
What I was ment to say was why they don't show us 3 videos for each battle report. one video with comments(as they did till now) and 2 more videos from each player point of view. so we can see the game in more dettails, and we can see how each player manage is own way of gameplay. would't it be better? (sorry for my english)
dante wrote:What I was ment to say was why they don't show us 3 videos for each battle report. one video with comments(as they did till now) and 2 more videos from each player point of view. so we can see the game in more dettails, and we can see how each player manage is own way of gameplay. would't it be better? (sorry for my english)
That would be nice yeah, they could have small video screens on the side that always are first person, and you could click on them to switch the main screen. Btw nothing wrong with your english, it's better than most's
What I don't get is the fact that there is a lot of things in SC2 that go BOOM! right now. So the baneling doesn't hit friendly units, the D8 charge doesn't hit friendly units, but the hunter-seeker missile does? The hunter-seeker also hits air when it explodes.
So my question is, if Blizzard keeps all these abilities then they all would have to be the same, meaning, that all of these abilities cause damage to friendlies or do not cause damage to friendlies. I just think there is a lot of possibilities that could go wrong if all of these abilities were not on the same page.
Also, as mucha s I like the hunter-seeker missile, I feel that a really good player with several nighthawks could destroy the enemies economy fairly easy. I spent a lot of time thinking about it and the ability might be to powerful, but I'd LOVE to keep it.
AUDIE wrote:Also, as mucha s I like the hunter-seeker missile, I feel that a really good player with several nighthawks could destroy the enemies economy fairly easy. I spent a lot of time thinking about it and the ability might be to powerful, but I'd LOVE to keep it.
i think its ok for friendly fire. Its force us to have a good micro to dont be hit by the splash dmg. And most of Terran unit is only range so its just good. we can you this abilitie to kick ass of hidden and air unit
I believe that the Zerg player was holding back a little personally. But with Audies help i noticed that we see everything he did not. He had no idea what the terran had in the back of there base. Still im upset we didnt get to see much Tech from Zerg thanks and cya.
Brandonsc2 wrote:I believe that the Zerg player was holding back a little personally. But with Audies help i noticed that we see everything he did not. He had no idea what the terran had in the back of there base. Still im upset we didnt get to see much Tech from Zerg thanks and cya.
Plus the zerg had HALF the mineral minners. Zerg would of won, but cooper forgot or chose not to make more miners. Once terran got his expandsion up and running, zerg was producing half the resources.
I think the queen would be asexual since there's nothing fertilizing her larva... except you, the player... eww.
+ I liked this match. Thank you Blizzard. I can't wait to see PvZ + Marauder graphics are awesome. + Banshee is bad-a$$. + Slow burrow on spine crawler makes sense or else you just have lurkers. + Creep block is awesome. + Hydralisk model is awesome.
- Watchtowers seem forced and not worth the trouble. Hunter Seeker Missile is too aggressive for that unit. Marauder can only get two in a bunker. It makes sense. I just don't like it.
That's what I noticed mostly. Very cool overall.
How do you spell Marauder so it picks up the link?
phlored wrote:I think the queen would be asexual since there's nothing fertilizing her larva... except you, the player... eww.
+ I liked this match. Thank you Blizzard. I can't wait to see PvZ + Marauder graphics are awesome. + Banshee is bad-a$$. + Slow burrow on spine crawler makes sense or else you just have lurkers. + Creep block is awesome. + Hydralisk model is awesome.
- Watchtowers seem forced and not worth the trouble. Hunter Seeker Missile is too aggressive for that unit. Marauder can only get two in a bunker. It makes sense. I just don't like it.
That's what I noticed mostly. Very cool overall.
How do you spell Marauder so it picks up the link?
As you did, Marauder. M-A-R-A-U-D-E-R. (It only links to the wiki once per article, so if you say for instance: " Marine Marine Marine !" only one will be highlighted/a link)
Oh and I agree with the Watchtower thing, they feel forced. If they disappeared, I for one would not miss them.
spotlight
search
account
80 comments
#1 PKZeppelin
#2 Tiger0211
You can download the lower quality version (this is the one that plays on the page as a flash video) directly here: http://us.media.blizzard.com/starcraft2 ... ort_02.flv
Edit: At around 6:27 we see that the Banelings now walk instead of roll. I don't believe this was known before...interesting. They look a bit too slow and bloated in their walk to me, but with their increased size (size increased a long time ago, probably started walking shortly after) I think I prefer it to a humongous rolling thing.
Full size video is now 7% downloaded (52.5/678 MB).
Edit2: Around 10:27 Dustin says "terrible, terrible damage"
#3 Undifty
About the Hunter Seeking missile- it did less damage than I actually expected it to do(luckily), but it seems like a fun ability.
Oh, and infantry units have different sizes? Apparently a bunker can only hold two Marauders?
Isn't that before the speed upgrade? Or do they actually only walk now?
Now I've got to watch it again!
#4 TusHin[TL]
But its me or the egg for gas is different ? its like 3:00 min
#5 Johnnyxp64
#6 Idomis
Hunter-Seeker Missiles are mega-powerful. With Siege Tanks, D8, and HS, what can stop Terran? Immortals?
#7 Tiger0211
I don't know if the Banelings ever actually had their speed upgraded in this game. Not sure.
Also, we finally got a visual confirming that it's MULE, not Mule, so unfortunately part of one of our questions as part of the fansite Q&A is now already known.
#8 RaZorPro
but the baneling unit is walking! :S:S very bad :S
#9 Khalleb
#10 HaoWard
#11 Tiger0211
#12 Idomis
Did you notice the super-slow burrow time on the Spine Crawler, though?
#13 imp
Edit: Yeah, its the old one like mentioned below.. Atleast it shows the infestor used in a unburrowed state.
Check out 15:15 - 15:23, moving across the bottom of the screen.
#14 Idomis
GAH! It's the old Infestor. Good find, though.
#15 imp
True, I guess I should have mentioned it in my first reply that its not the new one.. my bad.
Atleast it answers one of Tiger0211's question: It shows the infestor used unburrowed
#16 Tiger0211
Huh, that's weird...I wonder if they only have the art but haven't made the new in-game model based on it yet.
BTW my download stopped at 96% and is only uploading now.
#17 AUDIE
The nighthawk was amazing, I hope it stays that way. I can see the HS missil being to powerful though, but it can be stopped. Overall it was a awesome game. The zerg units could use some more work, but I felt they were much better balanced then before.
The baneling walks? interesting, but it looked great though. New infester work was good, hydras need to be more effective vs marine, but I'm not complaining.
David Kim made a lot of mistakes, but was still able to pull it off.
Marauder had new attack grpahics, death graphics great.
Overall I give it a 9.325 out of 10. This game is really shaping up to look good. Now all we need to do is fix the upgrade system!
Terran 2-0
Protoss 0-1
Zerg 0-1
EAT IT DEE F Q!!!
#18 Lipton
If the Zerg had gone mutas, it could have been a much different game, but then of course David Kim seems to be their best game tester there
#19 Khalleb
#20 Idomis
If you've seen the Yellow vs. Sonkie game, it doesn't look like it will be particularly glorious for Zerg. But who knows with the number of changes that have gone into the game since then.
I wish the commentators had talked about the MULE drop @ 19:42. Notice the huge number of SCVs and the single MULE forced to distance-mine. He doesn't stop them, either, if you watch the minimap.
#21 Khalleb
yea build this is an old build i want to see that on the new build
#22 BringCrunchaz
#23 Khalleb
#24 ALEXGACK
#25 Johnnyxp64
they over reduced the effects imo! hope we will see more animation and speciall effect in the betta, those animation where like 2d dos old games.
#26 Khalleb
they are slow but he explode sometime after he launch, so u are able to run away.
i think its like 15 sec bfr the explosion
#27 AUDIE
I think they were great. It isn't about graphics either. they were well done animations.
#28 Idomis
I also liked the death animations very much. To be honest, I don't want the clutter and smoke.
#29 AUDIE
The clutter and smoke was an original complaint from the proleague. So it has to go!
Plus those Hunter Seeker Missile were insane! I hope they keep those in the game.
My only question is was that fat thing the infester and did it kill the nighthawk?
#30 Tiger0211
I don't recall an Infestor killing a nighthawk, and it seems pretty unlikely considering its lack of attack and its abilities, but the Infestor still has its old purple pear with mouths model, so you'd probably recognize it. I do recall a Queen killing a Nighthawk at one point...or was it a Banshee? I don't remember. Either way, the Queen seems to be quite good at killing air.
#31 eLFootman
#32 AUDIE
Yes the Queen does seem like a good air killer. Those hunter-seeker missiles though did a great job saving the terran from destruction. I was suprised how weak hydralusk seem vs marines and I was also surprised how long marines lasted without medivac.
#33 scor
We waited 10 years and have no female units.I hate dustin browder.should be fired as soon as possible...
StarCraft 2 disappointment...always disappointment
#34 AUDIE
So? Is this a equal rights movement? It's a game my friend. Please relax and enjoy the game.
#35 Undifty
Agree
I want sexy pixels! And I want it NOOOOW!
#36 scor
I hope the future will be better but attention bilizzard... nobody glad starcraft 2...
#37 AUDIE
Are you from America or were you born in another country?
#38 Icesong
#39 PKZeppelin
P.S. That Terran SCVs drop on new expansion was pretty awesome.
Also it looks a bit "acted" to show different units and abilities, rather than win. Terran without Siege Tank in TvZ? No Lurkers? C'mon, so many gas wasted on these Banelings...
Btw, graphics look a bit nerfed.
#40 Kontan
I might be wrong here, but isnīt the Medivac a female unit?
#41 Khalleb
yea she is.
and u will be able to find some femel hero in the campaigne
#42 shadowie
Euhm, this is the best SC2 has ever looked, it's a recent build with most of the new shaders, did you see the dust breeze thingy in the middle?
Also, these games are just for fun to showcase the game, not give the best of esports.. and hindsight is 20/20
#43 Tiger0211
I wonder if Nova will be making an appearance. The stories of SC:G and SC2 are supposed to happen about the same time in the lore. Besides that, and Kerrigan since I'm assuming we're talking about Terran units here, have you heard somewhere that there will be some female heroine(s) (not to be confused with heroin
p.s. my mineral count is now palindromic, i.e. it's 13331 and if you reverse that it's still 13331
#44 Khalleb
i just guessing but...
we got some art with female caracter
#45 TusHin[TL]
#46 Undifty
Couldn't agree more, I really enjoyed the graphics. And the animations are just great- but a big minus in the Battle Report was the pathing-bug for the Drone as it was chasing the SCV around the Bunker at the start of the video. (It got stuck and stopped moving for maybe a second or so.)
About the heroines, I really hope we get to see some!
#47 TusHin[TL]
#48 Icesong
Had a male placeholder portrait last I saw. Marine, I think. Though of course it will be no surprise if it does get a female one.
#49 AUDIE
It's a female medic picture now ^^
#50 lewler
#51 Khalleb
this is right i dont like them... a cheeze player can just spam massege and full ur screen that pretty annoye and i have to reflexe to look the left not the middle
#52 TusHin[TL]
#53 ALEXGACK
#54 BringCrunchaz
Also really like the map design, and the overall art texture.
#55 Idomis
/squelch annoyingjerk
#56 Undifty
+1
#57 Icesong
I'm actually kind of bothered by the way they look, and I'm really bothered by the way they move. When they get their wings they look better. And hydralisks' tails whip way too fast when they move.
I warmed up to Marines having shields though.
#58 AUDIE
/squelch annoyingjerk[/quote]
+1[/quote]
+2 ^^
#59 Khalleb
HEY THIS IS ME WHO TELL THAT !!!! ^^ just kidding
#60 dante
Are they going to show us a battle report with 4 players. it would be more fun.
#61 TusHin[TL]
I dont know if a 2v2 is a good idea. But a 2v2 can show us some new ability who can use on an other race
#62 Khalleb
im not so sure for the 2v2. I don't even find any game in 2v2 as much entertening as an 1v1 matchu up
#63 ALEXGACK
#64 dante
(sorry for my english)
#65 shadowie
That would be nice yeah, they could have small video screens on the side that always are first person, and you could click on them to switch the main screen. Btw nothing wrong with your english, it's better than most's
#66 AUDIE
So my question is, if Blizzard keeps all these abilities then they all would have to be the same, meaning, that all of these abilities cause damage to friendlies or do not cause damage to friendlies. I just think there is a lot of possibilities that could go wrong if all of these abilities were not on the same page.
Also, as mucha s I like the hunter-seeker missile, I feel that a really good player with several nighthawks could destroy the enemies economy fairly easy. I spent a lot of time thinking about it and the ability might be to powerful, but I'd LOVE to keep it.
Any thoughts on these two issues for balance?
#67 Idomis
Thoughts? How about severe rage?
#68 TusHin[TL]
#69 Brandonsc2
#70 AUDIE
Plus the zerg had HALF the mineral minners. Zerg would of won, but cooper forgot or chose not to make more miners. Once terran got his expandsion up and running, zerg was producing half the resources.
#71 LoVeRBoy[E]
#72 Brandonsc2
#73 TusHin[TL]
Me its so fun to put Fungal Infestation on them to see a terran explode and i like Infested Terran
#74 ALEXGACK
#75 Brandonsc2
I think that the infested terran look great also. They remind me of the flood from halo alot though. So they should change it a little.
#76 Khalleb
#77 phlored
+ I liked this match. Thank you Blizzard. I can't wait to see PvZ
+ Marauder graphics are awesome.
+ Banshee is bad-a$$.
+ Slow burrow on spine crawler makes sense or else you just have lurkers.
+ Creep block is awesome.
+ Hydralisk model is awesome.
- Watchtowers seem forced and not worth the trouble.
Hunter Seeker Missile is too aggressive for that unit.
Marauder can only get two in a bunker.
That's what I noticed mostly. Very cool overall.
How do you spell Marauder so it picks up the link?
#78 Undifty
As you did, Marauder. M-A-R-A-U-D-E-R.
(It only links to the wiki once per article, so if you say for instance: " Marine Marine Marine !" only one will be highlighted/a link)
Oh and I agree with the Watchtower thing, they feel forced. If they disappeared, I for one would not miss them.
#79 staskazz
watchtower would be more valuable if they could detect cloaked/ burrowed units
#80 Undifty
That'd be overpowered, as it has a huge range.